Who Can Afford Affordable Housing?

Dan has an opinion about wasteful government spending...

So I read in the Washington Post last week that Montgomery County is projecting a shortage of affordable housing and "needs" for the government to help provide a minimum of 70,000 new units over the next 20 years for people who make less than $50,000.


What happened to the market economy?  When and where a product is demanded - of any type - private enterprise (unencumbered by onerous regulations and taxes) will find a way to provide it.  If the profit incentive to satisfy the demand doesn't exist… perhaps the market is better off without the product.  In any event, our government has proven inept at providing services.  Why would we trust it to intervene in the housing market more than it already does?

The worst part?  The concern is based on projected immigration patterns.  So people who are not here, are not part of our community (yet) are going to be the beneficiaries of a wealth transfer from me and all other property owners in the county.  That's right, the County Council is taking money from hardworking, home-owning taxpayers and using it to subsidize housing for people who don't even live here yet! 

And why would people who can't afford Montgomery County come here?  Perhaps the excellent, bi-lingual schools are an attraction?  Perhaps they come to enjoy quasi-urban living where you really can live car-free?  Perhaps people have heard about our generous social services that ensure all residents can access higher education and health care regardless of ability to pay and an abundance of opportunities for anyone willing to work.

Folks, wake up.  Montgomery has nothing to be ashamed of relative to our generosity to the poor and working classes.  Our beneficence is manifest and will keep attracting service workers and unemployed people without any effort to create MORE affordable housing.  We need to actually reverse these spending patterns and work to attract wealthy individuals and businesses to Montgomery County.

Wealthy people own businesses, employ workers and pay taxes.  This alone should attract workers - without the government spending YOUR tax money on social services.  When the government charges too much in taxes or makes  living here unattractive to the wealthy,  we risk turning the equation around.  Demographic patterns clearly show Montgomery County is in the process of chasing away wealthy taxpayers in favor of the poor and working classes.  That's all well and good if it makes you feel good, but play out the long term consequences and not only will we run low on taxpayers but without the revenue they provide, we won't be able to pay for any of the social services of which we are rightly proud.

It is counter-intuitive to those whose political persuasion demands increasing our reliance on entitlements, but economic truths are hard to deny.  If you think it's important for the government to give more pie to the less fortunate, you need to grow the pie.  Increasing taxes and entitlements means less pie for everyone and eventually… you'll run out of pie.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Jeff Hawkins January 19, 2012 at 07:54 PM
@Theresa, Frank is a little misguided maybe, but a "cult" member? Who knew? :)
Nearby January 26, 2012 at 12:39 AM
"Demographic patterns clearly show Montgomery County is in the process of chasing away wealthy taxpayers in favor of the poor and working classes. " Good Tentacled Prime Mover! Who let the riff raff in? Throw up the gates now and hire the security guards. Please show us (using your demographic patterns or other real data) how we will "run low on taxpayers" by providing more dwellings for them. I suspect this person who wants us to "work to attract wealthy individuals and businesses to Montgomery County," would also gripe about the traffic involved or the improvements to transportation services needed to get all of the low-paid servants and workers to these individuals and business from the places he would rather have them live.
Dan Grossberg January 26, 2012 at 07:30 PM
Thanks all for the thoughtful comments. Please check out my post on the SOTU. http://northpotomac.patch.com/blog_posts/the-state-of-the-union-7986f050
Corbin Dallas Multipass January 26, 2012 at 10:38 PM
I would have liked to have seen a response to: * Nearby's request for demographic data about how we're going to "run low on taxpayers". * How you made generally hypocritical statements about the county being inept at delivering services while claiming they deliver "excellent" public schools. * How you misrepresented the study in the very article you cited and ignored why these policies were recommended.
Daniel Grossberg February 07, 2012 at 10:49 PM
See my latest column on the Bag Tax: http://northpotomac.patch.com/blog_posts/litter-control-who-are-we-kidding#comments_list


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »